Friday, 5 July 2013

New law for biological needs of divorced women

GHAZIABAD: The Vaishali police on Thursday arrested one teacher of a private school in Indirapuram for allegedly raping and stalking a middle aged woman. Various courts has observed number of times that “Having sexual relations with a woman on false promise of marriage amounts to rape”. While rejecting bail plea of teacher court has held that entering into a sexual relationship with a woman after making her a false promise of marriage amounts to rape. The judgment is bound to have widespread ramifications for both women's rights and criminal justice as the issue involves the question of consent by adults and also whether such an offence is not rape but a fraud perpetrated by one party against the other.
In this case under judgment, the accused Bijla Lal, eloped with his neighbor from Vaishali.
According to the victim, the two had exchanged mobile chats on “Whatsapp” where accused sent icon of flower, heart and finally a ring. So, she assumed that accused will marry her and hence she had sex multiple times in the last one year under this impression.
According to the accused, the victim who is divorced lady and a single mother living alone from the last five years pleaded him for sex. He informed that victim further cursed Indien judiciary for having no provision for sexual satisfaction of estranged wives. It should be noted that there are multiple provisions for maintenance and shelter for separated/divorced wife but nothing for her biological needs. 
When our correspondent approached National commission of wives and asked them “when Government is making IRBM(Irretrievable breakdown of marriage) law to give half property of husband and his family members to divorced wife than how can they forget natural physical need of a female?.” Spokesperson Ms.Golmatol informed that commission is looking under this aspect as denial of having sex with wife when she demands is also a crime under Domestic Violence act, 2004 and they will make some provision shortly for such females.

Accused is charged under IPC 354 D (Stalking) and 376(Rape). Stalking charge was added because accused has sent “whatsapp” smiley messages thrice while victim was only replying him with a red face icon. “IPC 354D. (1) Whoever follows a person and contacts, or attempts to contact such person to foster personal interaction repeatedly, despite a clear indication of disinterest by such person, or whoever monitors the use by a person of the internet, email or any other form of electronic communication, or watches or spies on a person in a manner that results in a fear of violence or serious alarm or distress in the mind of such person, or interferes with the mental peace of such person, commits the offence of stalking.



Note:This is fake news just to create awareness of misuse of laws in society

Spying on wife termed as stalking

 

Delhi: The court here on Monday convicted a man for one year simple imprisonment on charge of hiring detectives for spying on wife. In his statement to court he had alleged that his wife was having an extra marital affair with Mr.Amjit Gupla, a neighbor.
The husband Mr. Abhijak Sherma, had managed to capture their intimate act, when Mr.Gupla and Mrs. Sherma were satisfying their carnal desires in a hotel room.  He had hired a detective agency for the expose and then filed divorce on grounds of adultery under Hindu marriage Act, citing the evidence gathered.
The case took a bizarre turn when the husband was accused of stalking and was arrested under IPC 354.  It should be noted that after 16 Dec Delhi rape incident, the government – bowing to media hype had crawled when asked to bend and – passed new anti-rape laws. Hence the court took suo moto cognizance itself on the husband’s statement.
The IPC section 354C says, “Whoever watches, or captures the image of, a woman engaging in a private act in circumstances where she would usually have the expectation of not being observed either by the perpetrator or by any other person at the behest of the perpetrator shall be punished on first conviction with imprisonment of either description for a term which shall not be less than one year, but which may extend to three years”.
While giving order court also observed that when there is no law to punish wife for being adulterous. Then, how can anyone even think that women can make a such relation with any other man apart from her husband.

Note:This is fake news just to create awareness of misuse of laws in society